There are doubts about the planned closure of the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in California following the recent energy crisis. The station is currently the state’s largest electricity supplier, accounting for over 9% of the state’s energy needs. It has the capacity to serve a population of over 3 million.
Continue reading below
Our featured videos
The Diablo Canyon Power Plant began operations in 1985. It was designed at a time when environmental laws were quite loose and non-existent in some areas. Today, the resort is considered an outdated entity, with its facilities representing everything that is wrong with current environmental laws. He is unable to manage his waste properly and is accused of having a negative impact on the groundwater system. The other reason many want it is its proximity to earthquake prone regions.
Related: Hydropower sparks debate as New York fights for clean energy
The plant was scheduled to close in 2025, as it is the last of the nuclear power plants to have served the state. However, many officials appear to have changed their minds, given the grim reality of state preparedness. The state is currently not prepared to provide the amount of power that the station provides from any other source. With targets to reach net zero by 2045, the plant closure could be a direct hit to targets. Some fear that by shutting down the power plant, the state will be forced to revert to fossil fuels.
Among those advocating for the power plant to continue are energy experts, scientists and even California Governor Gavin Newsom. On the other hand, critics of such a move say it would be just a step backwards in efforts to become carbon neutral.
California had many nuclear power plants spread across the state, but they were shut down one by one. In 1976, a law was passed prohibiting the construction of new nuclear power plants until there was technology to permanently dispose of nuclear waste. As a result, Diabo Canyon remained the state’s only permanent nuclear power plant.
Diablo Canyon has been a source of controversy for a long time. The debate about its ease of use and durability began long before the start of factory operations. There have been protests against the establishment of the plant after accidents such as the Fukushima nuclear accident which caused serious injuries and deaths. However, the plant also helped meet California’s energy needs.
Via The Guardian
Main image via Pexels